Sentencia nº 1058/1998 de TS, Sala 1ª, de lo Civil, 14 de Noviembre de 1998
Enlazado como:
Enlazado como:
Resumen
OTRO IDIOMA
Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Extracto
Sentencia nº 1058/1998 de TS, Sala 1ª, de lo Civil, 14 de Noviembre de 1998
r was found to be a valid service mark; and Cellular One Group v. Paul Brien, ICANN/WIPO Case No. D2000-0028, March 10, 2000 where the domain name was found confusingly similar to the mark Cellular One; and General Electric Company v. Pars International Computer, Inc., ICANN/WIPO Case No. D2000-0368, July 25, 2000 finding the domain name confusingly similar to the GE mark).
Legitimate Rights or Interests The Respondent states it has a State of Maryland, USA trademark for Netafrik but produces no evidence beyond the bare assertion and, in any case, it is the Complainant’s service mark Ticketmaster that concerns us here. The Respondent has produced no evidence it has been commonly known by, or had any co...Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Enlaces patrocinados
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. Todos los Derechos Reservados.
Contenidos en vLex España
Explora vLex
Para Profesionales
Para Socios
Compañía
Otros documentos:
Sentencia nº 85/1999 de AP Murcia October 19 1999 | sentencia de ap málaga, sección 3ª, december 02, 1998 | Sentencia nº 476/2006 de Audiencia Provincial, May 04, 2006 | sentencia de ts, sala 3ª, de lo contencioso-administrativo, september 11, 2008 | permagard uk limited | mary and her team get the job done | grown-up laura is parting with martijn | We re Often Accused of Being [ .. ]